In your report:
Identify the specific test you took, and provide an active link to that
test.
Compare the test items in that test with the kinds of things that should
be included in tests of intelligence that would correspond to the types
of intelligence described by Thurman, Gardner, and Sternberg.
Try to find, and discuss, any information that indicates anything about
the validity and reliability (Review Chapter 1, pages 54 and 55) of the
test you took. If you cannot find any such information, use your
best judgment to determine how that test might fare.
Use "proper" terminology throughout.
Compare the results of the first intelligence test that you took with
the results of this one.
Did both tests provide approximately the same indication of intelligence,
or is there a significant difference between the two assessments?
What aspects of your own intelligence, as identified by Thurstone,
Gardner, and/or Sternberg, do these tests measure adequately? Not
measure adequately?
Which test do you think gives the more accurate indication of your
actual level of intelligence?
Have you ever taken an actual Intelligence Test (one of those discussed
in the textbook)? How did the results of that test compare to the
results produced by these two tests?